Facts
Enforcement of a construction award raised arbitrability objections concerning procurement by a publicly owned company.
Holding and outcome
The Supreme Court upheld the writ. Application of 223-FZ did not itself establish a statutory prohibition; evidence of a budget-financing violation had not been produced.
Limits of the holding
Do not extend this holding to state contracts under 44-FZ or every procurement category. Current law, contract type and procedural-code restrictions must be checked.
Sources and legal references
Supreme Court, 11 July 2018, 305-ES17-7240Copy from a legal database
General information. The applicable legal framework depends on the particular dispute, seat and enforcement country.